Thursday, July 28, 2005

The Evidence

On Roberts is here.

6 Comments:

Blogger Peter L. Winkler said...

Evidence of what? I read some of it-my eyes are bothering me right now-and having studied law, understood the general ideas being discussed. Roberts appears to be a competent legal scholar. That's what I take from these documents.

So what exactly is the problem, as you see it?

8:11 PM  
Blogger Mark said...

He's a legal scholar who has every conclusion in hand a priori according to right-wing ideology. In every case. That's preordained, and that's the idea. He's also a family friend and water carrier.

8:16 PM  
Blogger Mark said...

Get out of here you inbred wingnut moron. I'm sending this to blogger.

8:40 AM  
Blogger Mark said...

Done. Your profile and accont will be revoked.

In the ad hominem you claim my credentials are "self-proclaimed." That would be your opinions which are unsubstantiated. Mine are backed by the California State University and 14 years with the US Government. I've worked for both Bushes even though I disagree with them. That's America.

Your arguing skills are so limp that personal attacks are all you have. You won't have them for much longer.

9:03 AM  
Blogger Mark said...

What the hell kind of name is Raoul Underhill? And more pertinent why is he so ashamed of his looks and intelect that he hides behind anonymity? Why, that's what all trolls do. They have to.

Again, I didn't detect an idea in the screed.

8:01 PM  
Blogger Mark said...

Net lingo? Trollery is still in vogue dipshit and you illustrate it perfectly. Butter? Look in the mirror you fucking asshole. I intend to bury your troll ass.

10:15 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

The Environmental Webring
The Environmental Webring
[ Join Now | Ring Hub | Random | << Prev | Next >> ]